This comparison is most useful when both scooters look viable and you need the decision to break on charging, value, or day-to-day fit.
Scooter comparison
Suzuki e-Access vs Bajaj Chetak 3501
The e-Access is the fresher new entrant with an official fast-charge option and a more modern digital brief, while the Chetak 3501 remains the calmer buy if brand trust, simpler ownership, and lower spend matter more than novelty.
India lens
Use this comparison to break the tie on charging, value, and fit, then validate the winner with your own running-cost estimate.
Verdict: Choose the e-Access if you want Suzuki brand familiarity plus the fast-charge angle. Choose the Chetak 3501 if you want the safer low-drama ownership play at a lower price.
| Spec | Suzuki e-AccessStandard | Bajaj ChetakC3501 3.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price & cost | ||
| Reference price | ₹1,90,665 | ₹1,57,140 |
| Running cost (est.) | ≈ ₹0.33/km | ≈ ₹0.27/km |
| Performance | ||
| Top speed | 71 km/h | 80 km/h |
| Motor power | 4.1 kW | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 3.072 kWh | 3.5 kWh |
| Real-world range | 80-90 km | 105-125 km |
| Efficiency | 28 km/kWh | 33 km/kWh |
| Charge time | ~6.3 hrs | ~3 hrs |
| Fast / 0–80% charge | 0-80% in 4.3 hrs; fast charge 0-80% in 1.12 hrs | 0-80% in 3 hrs on the bundled 950 W charger; no DC fast charging |
| DC fast charge | Suzuki fast charging: 0-80% in 1.2 hours, 0-100% in 2.2 hours. | No |
| Space & practicality | ||
| Under-seat storage | — | 35 L |
| Kerb weight | 122 kg | — |
| Ground clearance | 165 mm | 168 mm |
| Wheel size | 12 inch | 12 inch |
| Brakes | Disc / Drum, CBS | Disc / Drum, CBS |
| Features | ||
| Display | Digital | 5-inch TFT touchscreen |
| Connected (app/Bluetooth) | Yes | Yes |
| Riding modes | 3 | 2 |
| Hill hold | — | Yes |
| Warranty | Battery 3 yr / 50,000 km | 3 yr / 50,000 km |
| Verdict | ||
| Best for | Conservative urban commuters who want a mainstream brand and simple fixed-battery ownershipRiders who value ride comfort and a usable city top speed over outright scooter performanceBuyers who want an official fast-charge option without moving into a swap-battery model | Riders who want the fully loaded Chetak — the C3501 is the only trim with a 5-inch TFT touchscreen, full map navigation, keyless ignition and remote startDaily commuters who want range and pace together — 153 km claimed and 80 km/h from a 3.5 kWh pack, with 0-80% in three hours on the bundled 950 W chargerBuyers who value a mainstream service network and a metal-bodied scooter — Bajaj covers the C3501 with a 3-year or 50,000 km warranty |
| Verdict | The e-Access is the cleanest choice for riders who want a no-drama branded electric scooter with useful city performance and an official fast-charge angle. It is not the segment thrill machine, but it looks well targeted at practical daily use. | The C3501 is the top of the Chetak range: the same 3.5 kWh fixed battery and 153 km claim as the C3502, but with a 5-inch TFT touchscreen, full map navigation, keyless ignition, remote start, hill hold, reverse assist, OTA updates and geo-fencing on top. Hardware is otherwise familiar Chetak — a steel body, BLDC hub motor, 80 km/h, 12-inch alloys on tubeless tyres, a 200 mm front disc and 130 mm rear drum with CBS, single-sided leading-link front suspension, 168 mm ground clearance, a 775 mm seat, 35 litres under the seat and 5 litres up front, with 0-80% in three hours on the bundled 950 W charger and a 3-year / 50,000 km warranty. Bajaj claims 153 km; we would plan around 105 to 125 km in real city use. Best for riders who want every Chetak feature and will pay roughly ₹12,000 more than the C3502 to get the screen and connected kit. |
| Spec source | View source | View source |
Decision path
Move from verdict to action without losing context.
Open Suzuki e-AccessInspect the full profile behind the left-side verdictOpen Bajaj ChetakInspect the full profile behind the right-side verdictRun the scooter calculatorUse your own prices before you pick the winnerFind charging stationsCheck the network near you before the faster-sounding option wins by default
e-Access Standard
The e-Access is the cleanest choice for riders who want a no-drama branded electric scooter with useful city performance and an official fast-charge angle. It is not the segment thrill machine, but it looks well targeted at practical daily use.
Real-world estimate.
Check if it suits your roads.
Conservative urban commuters who want a mainstream brand and simple fixed-battery ownershipRiders who value ride comfort and a usable city top speed over outright scooter performanceBuyers who want an official fast-charge option without moving into a swap-battery model
Chetak C3501 3.5 kWh
The C3501 is the top of the Chetak range: the same 3.5 kWh fixed battery and 153 km claim as the C3502, but with a 5-inch TFT touchscreen, full map navigation, keyless ignition, remote start, hill hold, reverse assist, OTA updates and geo-fencing on top. Hardware is otherwise familiar Chetak — a steel body, BLDC hub motor, 80 km/h, 12-inch alloys on tubeless tyres, a 200 mm front disc and 130 mm rear drum with CBS, single-sided leading-link front suspension, 168 mm ground clearance, a 775 mm seat, 35 litres under the seat and 5 litres up front, with 0-80% in three hours on the bundled 950 W charger and a 3-year / 50,000 km warranty. Bajaj claims 153 km; we would plan around 105 to 125 km in real city use. Best for riders who want every Chetak feature and will pay roughly ₹12,000 more than the C3502 to get the screen and connected kit.
Real-world estimate.
Check if it suits your roads.
Riders who want the fully loaded Chetak — the C3501 is the only trim with a 5-inch TFT touchscreen, full map navigation, keyless ignition and remote startDaily commuters who want range and pace together — 153 km claimed and 80 km/h from a 3.5 kWh pack, with 0-80% in three hours on the bundled 950 W chargerBuyers who value a mainstream service network and a metal-bodied scooter — Bajaj covers the C3501 with a 3-year or 50,000 km warranty
What tips the decision
Where one choice becomes easier to justify
- Suzuki e-Access adds a genuine official fast-charge angle that most practical family scooters still lack
- Bajaj Chetak 3501 is cheaper and benefits from a stronger proven-ownership story in the market
- The Suzuki offers a slightly higher top-speed ceiling for mixed city use
- The Chetak remains one of the strongest choices for buyers who value service reach and conservative product tuning
What keeps it honest
Tradeoffs you should not ignore
- Suzuki e-Access still needs to prove its real-world ownership story and local charger convenience after launch
- Chetak 3501 does not offer the same fast-charge angle or newer feature freshness as the Suzuki
- Neither scooter is aimed at buyers who want the sharper acceleration and app-heavy experience of the performance-led segment
Common questions
Frequently asked about this comparison
Which is better, Suzuki e-Access or Bajaj Chetak?
Choose the e-Access if you want Suzuki brand familiarity plus the fast-charge angle. Choose the Chetak 3501 if you want the safer low-drama ownership play at a lower price.
Which has more real-world range, Suzuki e-Access or Bajaj Chetak?
Bajaj Chetak goes further: about 105–125 km of real-world range per charge versus 80–90 km for Suzuki e-Access — roughly 30 km more on a typical charge.
Which is cheaper, Suzuki e-Access or Bajaj Chetak?
Bajaj Chetak is cheaper by about ₹33,500 ex-showroom: Suzuki e-Access ₹1,90,665 (verified 2026-04-14), Bajaj Chetak ₹1,57,140 (verified 2026-10-05). On-road prices vary by state, insurance and dealer offers, so compare the final quotes.
Which charges faster, Suzuki e-Access or Bajaj Chetak?
Bajaj Chetak charges faster at home. Suzuki e-Access takes about 6.3 hours to charge at home. Fast charging: Suzuki fast charging: 0-80% in 1.2 hours, 0-100% in 2.2 hours.. Bajaj Chetak takes about 3 hours to charge at home.
What tips the decision between Suzuki e-Access and Bajaj Chetak?
Key factors: Suzuki e-Access adds a genuine official fast-charge angle that most practical family scooters still lack; Bajaj Chetak 3501 is cheaper and benefits from a stronger proven-ownership story in the market; The Suzuki offers a slightly higher top-speed ceiling for mixed city use; and The Chetak remains one of the strongest choices for buyers who value service reach and conservative product tuning.
What are the tradeoffs in the Suzuki e-Access vs Bajaj Chetak 3501 comparison?
Tradeoffs to consider: Suzuki e-Access still needs to prove its real-world ownership story and local charger convenience after launch; Chetak 3501 does not offer the same fast-charge angle or newer feature freshness as the Suzuki; and Neither scooter is aimed at buyers who want the sharper acceleration and app-heavy experience of the performance-led segment.
Sources
Documents used for this verdict
Reviewed 2026-04-14
Next step
Use your own prices before you pick a winner.
Other scooter comparisons
Keep comparing before you decide.
Ola S1 Pro+ vs Ather 450X Gen 3Performance-first buyers choosing between the two biggest electric scooter brands in IndiaOla S1 X 3 kWh vs Ola S1 X+ 4 kWhOla buyers deciding whether the cheaper 3 kWh S1 X is enough or the 4 kWh S1 X+ is worth the step upOla S1 X 2 kWh vs TVS iQube 2.2 kWhBudget-first India electric scooter buyers choosing between the lowest-cost S1 X and the entry iQubeAther 450S vs Bajaj Chetak 3501City scooter buyers choosing between Ather's sharper software-led commuter and Bajaj's calmer conservative family-scooter answerTVS iQube ST vs Bajaj Chetak 3501Conservative buyers who want a trusted brand with a wide service network over a cutting-edge productAther Rizta vs TVS iQube STFamily-focused buyers choosing between Ather software polish and TVS range-and-service reassuranceSimple One Gen 2 vs Ola S1 Pro+Performance-first buyers chasing the biggest battery-and-speed story in the Indian scooter marketAmpere Nexus EX vs Hero Vida V2 ProPractical family-scooter buyers balancing quick home charging against stronger service-network reassuranceTVS X vs Ola S1 Pro+Performance-focused buyers deciding whether premium hardware and TVS backing justify spending more than Ola moneyHonda QC1 vs Honda Activa e:Honda-leaning urban buyers deciding whether a simple city scooter is enough or swap-network convenience justifies the upgradeHonda Activa e: RoadSync Duo vs Honda Activa e:Honda electric-scooter buyers deciding whether the connected RoadSync Duo trim is worth paying more than the standard Activa e:River Indie vs Ather RiztaPractical urban buyers deciding between River’s rugged utility-first scooter and Ather’s more polished family-comfort briefBGauss BG RUV 350 Max vs Ampere Nexus EXUtility-minded commuters choosing between BGauss' rugged large-wheel scooter brief and Ampere's more conventional family-scooter value playBGauss BG RUV 350 i EX vs BG RUV 350 MaxBG RUV 350 buyers deciding whether the lower-cost i EX variant is enough, or whether the Max variant's extra range and features are worth the price step-upAmpere Magnus Neo vs Honda QC1Budget city riders deciding whether to spend slightly more for a fuller everyday scooter or save money and accept a stricter low-speed urban briefKinetic Green E-Luna X3 vs Ampere Magnus NeoBudget India riders deciding between a lightweight moped-style runabout and a more conventional family-scooter commuterTVS iQube 3.5 kWh vs Ola S1 X+India scooter buyers choosing between TVS's conservative family-commuter brief and Ola's faster value-led range playTVS iQube 3.1 kWh vs TVS iQube 3.5 kWhIndia iQube buyers deciding whether the lower-cost 3.1 kWh variant is enough or the 3.5 kWh battery is worth paying forTVS iQube 2.2 kWh vs TVS iQube 3.1 kWhIndia iQube buyers deciding whether the cheaper 2.2 kWh variant is enough or the 3.1 kWh battery is worth paying forHero Vida V2 Plus vs Ather 450SIndia city commuters choosing between Hero's removable-battery commuter scooter and Ather's sharper performance-led urban briefHero Vida V2 Lite vs Hero Vida V2 PlusVida buyers choosing whether the lowest-cost V2 Lite is enough or the V2 Plus is worth the step up for more range headroomOla S1 X+ 4 kWh vs Ather Rizta Z 3.7 kWhIndia buyers choosing between Ola's value-led performance scooter and Ather's comfort-first family scooter at a similar price pointBGauss BG RUV 350 i EX vs Ampere Nexus EXValue-focused India commuters deciding between BGauss' rugged big-wheel utility scooter and Ampere's more conventional family scooter at almost the same priceTVS iQube 3.5 kWh vs Bajaj Chetak 3503Family-scooter buyers deciding between India's two most-trusted mainstream electric scooters with the same 3.5 kWh batteryTVS iQube 3.5 kWh vs Ather Rizta SFamily buyers choosing between TVS's best-selling iQube and Ather's comfort-first RiztaHonda Activa e vs TVS iQube 3.5 kWhBuyers choosing between Honda's battery-swap Activa e and the home-charged TVS iQube — usually decided by where you parkTVS Orbiter V2 vs TVS iQube 3.1 kWhTVS buyers comparing the new range-first Orbiter with the established iQube on the same 3.1 kWh batteryOla S1 Pro+ 5.3 kWh vs TVS iQube STLong-commute riders shortlisting the two biggest-battery electric scooters in IndiaAther 450 Apex vs Ola S1 Pro+ 5.3 kWhEnthusiast buyers choosing between India's two flagship performance electric scooters at nearly the same priceHero Vida VX2 Plus 4.4 kWh vs TVS iQube STLong-range family-scooter buyers, especially apartment dwellers deciding whether a removable battery mattersBajaj Chetak 3503 vs Ather Rizta SFamily-scooter buyers choosing between Bajaj's metal-bodied Chetak and Ather's comfort-first Rizta at a similar price